We've compared financial outcomes between sugar marketers for the last three seasons, and Wilmar is in front.
Our new publication, Comparing Financial Outcomes, enables Wilmar cane suppliers to directly compare the financial outcomes they might have achieved under Wilmar and under QSL for the past three seasons.
This document looks at four alternative pricing allocation options available through both marketers and presents the comparative results for the 2018, 2019 and 2020 seasons.
The historical analysis shows that, for all four options, a grower would have achieved a better financial outcome over that full three-year period with Wilmar as their Grower Economic Interest Sugar marketer.
In summary, our analysis shows a grower nominating 1,000 tonnes IPS of GEI Sugar would have been up to $44,000 better off with Wilmar over that full three-year period.
For more information, you can download Comparing Financial Outcomes.